<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>election.ie &#187; waste management</title>
	<atom:link href="http://election.ie/tag/waste-management/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://election.ie</link>
	<description>Irish Politics and Current Affairs Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 18:57:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>ESRI rejects the SBP claim that Dublin waste report will be withdrawn</title>
		<link>http://election.ie/2010/02/esri-rejects-the-sbp-claim-that-dublin-waste-report-will-be-withdrawn/</link>
		<comments>http://election.ie/2010/02/esri-rejects-the-sbp-claim-that-dublin-waste-report-will-be-withdrawn/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 12:55:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alexia Golez</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ireland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[esri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Gormley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poolbeg incinerator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[richard tol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sunday business post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waste management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://election.ie/?p=644</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tol denies the word "withdraw" was used]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a class="highslide" onclick="return vz.expand(this)" href="http://election.ie/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/esri_feb7_report.png"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-645" title="esri_feb7_report" src="http://election.ie/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/esri_feb7_report.png" alt="" width="600" height="450" /></a></p>
<p>So last night, I posted on a front-page story from the <a href="http://thepost.ie">Sunday Business Post</a> that <a href="http://election.ie/2010/02/the-sunday-leads">claimed</a> that the <a href="http://www.esri.ie">ESRI</a> withdrawing a report on waste management in Dublin.</p>
<p>Titled &#8220;Errors force ESRI to withdraw waste document&#8221;, the piece by John Burke says:</p>
<blockquote><p>The Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI) is to withdraw a controversial report it published on waste management in Dublin because of errors in the document.</p>
<p>The report, which was published last week, criticised environment minister John Gormley&#8217;s waste strategy, leading the minister to query the think-tank&#8217;s standards in preparing the report. Now, in an embarrassing move for the ESRI, one of its most high-profile environment experts has said that the report is being pulled from circulation.</p></blockquote>
<p>The piece continues by quoting ESRI researcher Professor Richard Tol confirming that report would be rechecked:</p>
<blockquote><p>Any errors identified will be corrected&#8230; we&#8217;re in the middle of redoing what needs to be redone</p></blockquote>
<p>Last night, Tol <a href="http://election.ie/2010/02/the-sunday-leads/comment-page-1/#comment-221">commented</a> on the Sunday Leads post and denied that the report was being withdrawn:</p>
<blockquote><p>The ESRI will not withdraw the waste report.</p></blockquote>
<p>He also <a href="http://election.ie/2010/02/the-sunday-leads/comment-page-1/#comment-231">denied</a> that the ESRI used the word &#8220;withdraw&#8221; was used at all.</p>
<p>According to Tol, he told the Sunday Business Post the following:</p>
<blockquote><p>A number of people and organizations have claimed that  there are errors in the ESRI report &#8220;An Economic Approach to Municipal  Waste Management Policy in Ireland&#8221;. We are currently working through  these claims, assessing their veracity and, if so, the implications for  the conclusions. We will issue a response to the claims once we have  finished that work.</p></blockquote>
<p>Tol says that other media organisations were briefed to similar effect by report co-author Paul Gorecki as well.</p>
<p>Links of interest:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.esri.ie/publications/latest_publications/view/index.xml?id=2972">&#8216;An Economic Approach to Municipal  Waste Management Policy  in Ireland&#8217;</a>on the ESRI website</li>
<li><a href="http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/ireland/2010/0205/1224263813621.html">ESRI denies it &#8216;acted without integrity&#8217; on incinerator report</a> &#8211; Irish Times, February 5th 2010</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://election.ie/2010/02/esri-rejects-the-sbp-claim-that-dublin-waste-report-will-be-withdrawn/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

