<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Sunday Leads</title>
	<atom:link href="http://election.ie/2010/02/the-sunday-leads/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://election.ie/2010/02/the-sunday-leads/</link>
	<description>Irish Politics, Current Affairs and News Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 09:51:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ESRI rejects the SBP claim that Dublin waste report will be withdrawn &#124; election.ie</title>
		<link>http://election.ie/2010/02/the-sunday-leads/comment-page-1/#comment-234</link>
		<dc:creator>ESRI rejects the SBP claim that Dublin waste report will be withdrawn &#124; election.ie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 12:57:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://election.ie/?p=624#comment-234</guid>
		<description>[...] last night, I posted on a front-page story from the Sunday Business Post that claimed that the ESRI withdrawing a report on waste management in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] last night, I posted on a front-page story from the Sunday Business Post that claimed that the ESRI withdrawing a report on waste management in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Tol</title>
		<link>http://election.ie/2010/02/the-sunday-leads/comment-page-1/#comment-231</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Tol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 09:28:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://election.ie/?p=624#comment-231</guid>
		<description>@Bernie
No one in the ESRI used the word &quot;withdraw&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Bernie<br />
No one in the ESRI used the word &#8220;withdraw&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexia Golez</title>
		<link>http://election.ie/2010/02/the-sunday-leads/comment-page-1/#comment-225</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexia Golez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 00:05:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://election.ie/?p=624#comment-225</guid>
		<description>@Bernie: They are two completely different things and seem totally contradictory. Pick up a copy tomorrow and read it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Bernie: They are two completely different things and seem totally contradictory. Pick up a copy tomorrow and read it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bernie Goldbach</title>
		<link>http://election.ie/2010/02/the-sunday-leads/comment-page-1/#comment-224</link>
		<dc:creator>Bernie Goldbach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 23:57:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://election.ie/?p=624#comment-224</guid>
		<description>Publishing amendments does not mean the original is withdrawn. I&#039;m curious to see who in ESRI used the term &quot;withdraw&quot; because that seems over-reaching.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Publishing amendments does not mean the original is withdrawn. I&#8217;m curious to see who in ESRI used the term &#8220;withdraw&#8221; because that seems over-reaching.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexia Golez</title>
		<link>http://election.ie/2010/02/the-sunday-leads/comment-page-1/#comment-222</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexia Golez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 23:43:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://election.ie/?p=624#comment-222</guid>
		<description>The piece opens &quot;The Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI) is to withdraw a controversial report it published on waste management in Dublin because of errors in the document&quot; but later says &quot;it is understood the ESRI will publish an amended report this week or early next week&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The piece opens &#8220;The Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI) is to withdraw a controversial report it published on waste management in Dublin because of errors in the document&#8221; but later says &#8220;it is understood the ESRI will publish an amended report this week or early next week&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Tol</title>
		<link>http://election.ie/2010/02/the-sunday-leads/comment-page-1/#comment-221</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Tol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 23:37:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://election.ie/?p=624#comment-221</guid>
		<description>The ESRI will not withdraw the waste report.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ESRI will not withdraw the waste report.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: €40m Scandal! Religious orders demand taxpayer pay their Ryan inquiry legal bills &#124; election.ie</title>
		<link>http://election.ie/2010/02/the-sunday-leads/comment-page-1/#comment-220</link>
		<dc:creator>€40m Scandal! Religious orders demand taxpayer pay their Ryan inquiry legal bills &#124; election.ie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 23:35:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://election.ie/?p=624#comment-220</guid>
		<description>[...] important for the Sunday Leads, tomorrow&#8217;s Sunday Tribune reports that the religious orders criticised in the Ryan report [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] important for the Sunday Leads, tomorrow&#8217;s Sunday Tribune reports that the religious orders criticised in the Ryan report [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
